Re: [MV] Mosquito vs. B-17G

From: Nigel Hay (nigel@milweb.net)
Date: Sun May 06 2001 - 13:15:58 PDT


Curiously the Mosqiuto trialled the bouncing bombs used by Lancasters, .
Cheers, NIGE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Winnington-Ball" <gwball@sympatico.ca>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [MV] Mosquito vs. B-17G

> Carol Kenyon wrote:
>
> > Douglas Greville wrote that a twin-engine Mosquito could carry a bigger
> > payload than a
> > four-engine B-17?
> > It just so happens that my dad (who lives next
> > door) flew both. I'll ask him.
> > Don Kenyon
>
> Don, if I recall, I believe the standard payload for the B-17 on a medium
> range mission was 6,000lbs, where the Mossie could carry 4,000... but a
lot
> faster, with greater survivability and only a crew of two to lose if
things
> went REALLY wrong.
>
> You have to wonder if the money and resources which were poured into the
> Heavies had gone into a project like the Mossie. Thousands of them, at
high
> speed and bombing with pinpoint accuracy...
>
> Geoff
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:18:31 PDT