RE: [MV] Articulated M54?

From: Joe Garrett (j.garrett@gte.net)
Date: Thu May 31 2001 - 19:16:28 PDT


That truck looks like a standard M35 (not an A1 or an A2) to me. It isn't
even a diesel. This fits with the timeframe nicely. It has the headlights
mounted low, too, which indicates an early production truck. A five ton
truck would have 8 lug wheels, a longer hood, and a different looking grill.

It is really easy to get the rear axles pushed that far out of center just
by driving over a bump sideways. The rear axle is pushed in the opposite
direction, which is why you can't see it.

This IS an unusual angle to view the truck at, though.

Joe Garrett
cell 425-344-1402

-----Original Message-----
From: Military Vehicles Mailing List [mailto:mil-veh@mil-veh.org]On
Behalf Of Richard Lathrop
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:30 AM
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
Subject: [MV] Articulated M54?

Please take a look at this page from a 1963 Commando brochure.
http://www.cadillacgage.com/V100/1963PG9.HTML

It appears that the truck it is pulling is a 5 ton M54 and has an
articulated frame and is only a 4x4, has anyone run across such a vehicle?

Thanks,
Rick

===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:18:42 PDT