Re: [MV] AM Genral title for MUTT

From: Ron (rojoha@mediaone.net)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 13:59:33 PDT


Sorry Gene, but the printing over the AM General line isn't readable on any
of the three photo programs I used to look at the photo...will just have to
take your word. Does the Texas Title say it's a 1970 mutt titled on
04/23/69 or a 1979 mutt titled on 04/23/89?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Pantano" <truks@cs.quik.com>
To: "Ron" <rojoha@mediaone.net>
Cc: "MV LIST" <mil-veh@skylee.com>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] AM Genral title for MUTT

> Well--if you read English well enough...you will see that it says AMG
> Corporation South Bend Indiana as the SELLER !! Use your eyes and
> brain..Gene
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron" <rojoha@mediaone.net>
> To: "Gene Pantano" <truks@cs.quik.com>
> Cc: "MV LIST" <mil-veh@skylee.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 6:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [MV] AM Genral title for MUTT
>
>
> > Hi Gene and all:
> >
> > Not trying to throw gas on fire,Gene, but what is the photo supposed
> to
> > prove?
> > The blue Texas title has a date of (what looks like) 4/23/89 for a
> 1979
> > M151A2 MUTT. Mileage of 000017 can be attributed to new speedo
installed.
> > Does the owner claim he went to court and won the case, then got a
couple
> of
> > brand new 1979 units and then did nothing with them until 1989 in
regards
> to
> > certifying ownership.
> > The red paper work does not say "Certificate of Origin", which I
> believe
> > was required in 1979 by law of all manufacturers of motor vehicles, and
> the
> > only visible date on it is 'MARCH 98'. This makes no sense, since the TX
> > title says 1989 for an issue date?
> > Does the owner have anything that says "C of I" from AM General or a
> > State Title from anywhere that has a 1979 issue date with mileage in the
> 10
> > to 20 mile range. That type of documentation would lock it down for
> certain.
> > Otherwise, it could be just a series of purchased title paperwork from
the
> > old mills in New Hampshire or else where.
> > Again, not questioning your voracity, just curious if the claims can
> > documented beyond a reasonable doubt that would prove the rarity of the
> > vehicle. So far it's still circumstantial.
> > Ron
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gene Pantano" <truks@cs.quik.com>
> > To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:27 PM
> > Subject: Re: [MV] AM Genral title for MUTT
> >
> >
> > > Finally got Outlook Express working...
> > > if you go to www.cs.quik.com/truks/AMGTITLE.JPG
> > > you wil see one of only 2 real AM General Titles for the 2 151A2
MUTTS
> > sold
> > > to a private party by AMG.. The doubting Thomas's can buy the beers at
> the
> > > next meet.!!
> > > No names mentioned, but the guy that had the smart comments about AM
> "not"
> > > selling any MUTTS...what do you have to say now ??!!! Gene..
> > >
> > >
> > > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
> <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:59:11 PDT