RE: [MV] S1438

From: Jason (bmg1917a@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:08:37 PDT


Let's not forget live weapons too, we don't want it just to exclude
de-milled ones.
jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Military Vehicles Mailing List [mailto:mil-veh@mil-veh.org]On
Behalf Of Steven P. Allen
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
Subject: Re: [MV] S1438

This gives me an idea: might our best approach be, since it seems the
passage of this thing is a foregone conclusion, to have the term "SME"
redefined by Congress to specifically *exclude* HMVs,
re-enactor/collector/outdoor equipment, and de-milled weaponry?

Steve Allen

At 03:42 PM 10/5/01 -0500, kuhrick wrote:

>mine . . . says that tucks should not be called SME
>or what ever

===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 00:36:24 PST