Re: [MV] Who's Vehicle is it? (was: Big Brother IS watchingfor sure!)

From: opcom (opcom@vmsone.com)
Date: Sun Sep 08 2002 - 08:38:16 PDT


Good point on being able to show that the vehicle is yours. Last time I
took my M35 to (State Guard) training exercise on a National Guard base,
a Range Control Officer (someone you do not argue with) asked me to show
who's truck it was.

He was easily satisfied however when I showed him a copy of the title,
registration, and insurance which were all in my name.

It is easy to keep copies of these documents onboard.

Dave Ball wrote:
>
> I think the answer is simple it is not what you I or anyone else in the
> hobby thinks it up to the man at the door or the airshow or event of your
> choice once it is in his hands you have to prove you have the right to own
> and operate it. I know of half a dozen people who went through this. Some
> got there vehicles back, some did not, some went to jail, all lost a lot of
> money.
> If you are driving a 73 M151A2 and your title says its a 1973 Willys and the
> man at your door has a sheet of paper and looks for the numbers on your
> vehicle and it looks like a M151 and looks fishy what do you think will
> happen... hopefully "sorry to disturb you have a nice day"
> I was told by a California highway patrolman that use of the California
> highways is a privilege that can be revoked at the states discretion and
> that if it is decided a vehicle is unsafe he can have it towed to impound.
> At the time I was driving (limping) a Commercial hummer home from an offroad
> event and had a bad front end shimmy because of a bad ball joint (common) I
> finished the trip in the front seat of a tow truck with the Hummer riding on
> the flat bed.
> I have not heard of any confiscations in a while 4 or 5 years Back at least.
> If you are in the possession of former government property can you prove you
> have the right to own it? without a doubt? That's all that matters at least
> in my thinking I need that piece of mind when I drive on to a military
> reservation in my vehicle.
> Of course its good to get a property receipt at the gate if what you are
> driving looks like what they are driving, only cleaner and in better shape.
>
> Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jonathon" <jemery@execpc.com>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 8:48 PM
> Subject: [MV] Who's Vehicle is it? (was: Big Brother IS watching for sure!)
>
> > >I think the Bureaucrats have given some of us a break. If not do you know
> > >what would become of Gama Goats and 151A2's and a few other vehicles that
> > >were demilled as in cut in half or rendered unoperational or sold with
> paper
> > >stating for off road use only.
> > >Just because its repaired and registered for the highway by an agency not
> in
> > >the loop doesn't make it legal.
> >
> > I post this to the list in general, I am not being critical at all of your
> > post Dave, the topic just got me thinking about this subject on a more
> > general level.
> >
> >
> > Since when does a seller of anything have any right, legally, to control
> the
> > use of something they sell to someone else?
> >
> > I have a thought experiment here, perhaps if you believe that property
> > rights are absolute you'd agree with me, perhaps others have differing or
> > divergent viewpoints.
> >
> > The M151 is a good example as I want one but after collecting this stuff
> for
> > almost 20 years I do not yet have one. Concider that I buy several
> scrapped
> > vehicles which were sold (auctioned) as scrap or residue. Now I spend much
> > time and effort and perhaps money and I put one good vehicle back
> together.
> > Is it then an M151? If I go to the state to title and license it, is it an
> > M151 to them? I would have to say no on both question, it is a
> > reconstructed vehicle and perhaps depending on how much work I had to go
> > thru it might even be concidered home built. But to a fellow MV collector,
> > is it an M151? I'd say yes. I listen to people talk about titling
> problems
> > and I have to wonder what the big deal is with titles. Personally I think
> > they are useless and should be abandonded all together. But that won't be
> > happening soon. But what is the big deal about a title being correct for
> > the vehicle as built? So what if it says a 1996 home built truck (my
> > rewelded M151) or a 1963 Ford M151? So long as the serial number is
> correct
> > who cares? And as to serial numbers, I have talked to people where the
> state
> > refused to use the original number that was on the vehicle and they issued
> a
> > new VIN of the states choosing along with a small state issued tag and
> > little rivets with a "W" on the head (W for Wisconsin) to attach it with.
> > Seems to me if I had a choice between fighting them over a title that
> > matched the vehicle as built and having a new VIN with a small id plate I
> > had to attach somewhere, I guess I'd just as soon go with a new small
> plate
> > and new VIN for the title. What difference is that going to make to any
> > person I would sell it to in the future?
> >
> > Going back to reconstructing an M151, lets take that a step further. What
> if
> > I was so inclinded to make a body from scratch that was indistiguishable
> > from an original Ford or AMG. Is that then an M151? Having seen the work
> of
> > people such as John Geesink I would say that the right person can do this.
> > As to this idea of the seller (government) controlling the use of what
> they
> > sell, at what point is the item you posess the same or not at all the same
> > as the original item? Is the M151 that I got cut and then rewelded an
> M151?
> > What if I put a body together from many cut, crushed, or wrecked bodies,
> > should they be able to lay some claim on that? What then if I make a body
> > from scratch??? Where is that line, if any?
> >
> > Seem to me this stuff is sold (auctioned) by the government either as a
> > whole operable vehicle, implying a 97 would come with it, or as scrap
> metal.
> > What I do with either is my business.
> >
> > So go another step. M60's, M1's etc. are not supposed to be in private
> hands
> > at all right? So what if I reconstruct one from scraped units? what if I
> > make one from scratch? Can the government then come in and confiscate it?
> Is
> > either really a tank (of thiers)? Again..... how and where do you make the
> > distinction?
> >
> >
> > Sorry to ramble on so much, this topic is of some interest to me and it
> has
> > come up before, just looking for any interesting opinions I guess.
> >
> > later,
> >
> > je
> >
> >
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> >
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:21:19 PDT