From: w7ls (w7ls@blarg.net)
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:33:55 PDT
Typo. I meant to say "the newer +/- 2.5 KHz deviation". Jim
w7ls <w7ls@blarg.net> wrote:
> You would need a different discriminator, plus several other
> adjustments, none of which are necessary to comply with the regulations,
> all of which alter the authenticity of the radio, and besides, 6 meters
> is so barren of signals that overcrowding is a non-issue. The regs do
> not say you can't use +/- 15 KHz. They say to use the minimum spectrum.
> If that was strictly enforced, then even narrowband fm would not be
> legal, since the newer +/- 5 KHz would be more spectrum efficient. The
> FCC knows this, and they know 6 meters is barren. Just use the radios as
> they were intended. Jim
>
> Buzzard <Buzz@ebuzzard.com> wrote:
>
> > What about adjusting the radios to function within the regs. This is
> > pretty basic stuff.
> >
> > Any ham who can't or won't doesn't deserve their ticket!
> >
> > -=-
> > WM1W
> > -=-
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:24:06 PDT