Re: [MV] Hummer H2 picture (no mv content) - oops!

From: David Cole (DavidCole@tk7.net)
Date: Mon Jun 16 2003 - 09:18:57 PDT


You mean they are not so well heeled after throwing away $55K on a pickup
truck with a fancy body?

Dave

>>>>>>>>>

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 21:53:38 -0500, Jon Shoop <shoop19@brick.net> wrote:

> Its a chevy pickup chassis with a goofy psudo Hummer body.......for the
> not
> so well heeled.....
>
> Jon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob" <dodgew200@mchsi.com>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [MV] Hummer H2 picture (no mv content) - oops!
>
>
>> Well considering H2's are butt ugly, regular Hummers aren't much better
>> IMHO! It looks like two big heavy trucks that hit head on both did their
>> jobs...crumple zones absorbed most of the damage instead of the
>> occupants
>> and their innards, air bags probably prevented serious injury as well...
>>
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-
>> veh.org>
>> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>

-- 
Dave


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:21:45 PDT