Re: [MV] military radios threatened by the FCC (humor)

From: Patrick Jankowiak (eccm@swbell.net)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 20:48:58 PDT


It looks like this person is trying its very best to thank me for
posting the link to the FCC's proposed rulemaking page about the SSB
and AM bandwidth limitations.

We can tell that it is an educated person, by the excellent
punctuation, case usage, good command of the language, and also by how
the comment is well-reasoned and presented without emotinal bias.

Not only that, it used an anonymous remailer, to try to hide. What a
silly little thing. I wonder what it might be so fearful of?

So, here we have a validated example of the kind of mentality which
supports the proposed rulemaking.

I merely found it amusing, perhaps the reader will as well.

Here is the message, with the special wording blotted out.

===

From:
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer <nobody@cypherpunks.to>
Comments:
This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was
remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report
problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at
<abuse@cypherpunks.to>.

"thanks for posting that link to make comments to the FCC I sent them
my support for the bandwidth limits because of all the a**h*le am
sh**heads with sh** signals that make half of 20m worthless I sure am
glad you posted that link I probably would've heard about it or been
able to get my friends to support it"

===

well, time to go dig out another modulation transformer.. hehe..



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:22:46 PDT