From: wcvose (wcvose@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 13:10:10 PDT
campaign contributions and after service job offers for procurement
officers (no im not jaded)
Ryan M Gill wrote:
>
>> on 7/31/03 1:01 PM, Employee@MilVeh.com at milveh@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>
>>> Grenades are more intended to cause causalties, same
>>> for hard point ammo, all designed to put a casualty
>>> burden on the op force. A LAWS or it's big brother
>>> the TOW is just the opposite. Does anyone know why we
>>> stopped using the LAWS? Seemed like a pretty nice
>>
>> > weapon for infantry.
>
>
> We've got bigger warheads with better effects. Alan mentions the AT-4
> there's also the SMAW and SMAW-D. MPIM/SRAW is a future development
> possiblity for a more compact version.
>
> AT-4
> http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/at4.htm
>
>
> SMAW and SMAW-D
> http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/smaw.htm
> http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m141.htm
>
> MPIM/SRAW
> http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/sraw.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:23:33 PDT