From: Horrocks, Aaron (ACHb@pge.com)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 15:17:51 PDT
Okay, Joe Foley...
Thanks for posting my non-MV email I sent to you, to this list. That's just great. 'Heavy-petting', touching or grouping, is not penetration! Only when an appendage or even foreign object enters an orifice is it penetration.
Now I thought this was an MV list. Did it change over the weekend? I'd like to talk about MVs on the MV list. If you talk about penetration, whilst inside an MV, that's fine! =)
Gun Trucks? I'm all for them! If you're going to be in a convoy in hostile territory, I want 50cals on the lead and rear vehicles, every solider with a pistol, and whatever else you can toss in the mix to be better armed than the enemy. After all, it's pretty difficult and the exception when the lesser armed poorly equipped force defeats a well armed force. THAT'S the kind of stuff that makes history!
Aaron Horrocks
1952 M38A1
-----Original Message-----
From: Doc Bryant [mailto:rbhonk1@cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:05 PM
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
Subject: Re: [MV] [MVlist] DRMS article on Cnn
Aaron Horrocks wrote.....
Touching one's behind, is not penetration.
Correct, it just depends on who's behind it is. That determines whether its
just scratching an itch, or foreplay!
Doc Bryant
Let's go back to arguing historical syllogisms concerning gun trucks.
===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:25:01 PDT