From: Stephen & Jeanne Keith (cckw@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Feb 14 2004 - 09:55:32 PST
What about the B-52's?
They are a LOT older than the C-141's and will be
flying till at least 2040...
I HATE to see our (yours and mine) tax $$ wasted!
Forget the urban myth of the $500 hammer....
I spoke to the test Engineers at Aberdeen when they
were evaluating the Stweart and Stephenson trucks
and asked specifically if they had problems with the
seals in the axles (tires run 105 psi) and the Engineer
told me they had lots of problem with the eval vehicles.
Now the M35A3's are going to have this expensive
(not need in MHO) CTIS thrown away?
Steve AKA Dr Deuce
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Werner" <j_werner@pacbell.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [MV] Roll bar on 5 ton and deuces? Anyone know of a mil one?
> You're correct, Ryan. The 141's are obsolete. The main haulers now are the
> 17s, 130s, and C-5s.
> jw
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Military Vehicles Mailing List [mailto:mil-veh@mil-veh.org]On
> Behalf Of Ryan Gill
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:38 AM
> To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [MV] Roll bar on 5 ton and deuces? Anyone know of a mil
> one?
>
>
> At 12:15 PM -0500 2/14/04, Stephen & Jeanne Keith wrote:
> >I disagree! If they went to something at great $$ and now are
> >about to throw it away....
> >
> >The new Stewart & Stephenson trucks will not fit into a C141...
> >Someone should have been FIRED!
>
> Aren't they getting rid of the C141s? C130
> mobility was what they were going after. Odly
> enough, how is it they fit a C130 and not a C141?
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:28:33 PDT