.50 = DD? was: [MV] Ammo Cans and Fifties

From: Ryan Gill (rmgill@mindspring.com)
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 13:14:21 PST


At 3:28 PM -0500 12/3/04, Glenn Shaw wrote:
>Hi Aarron
>Re. the ammo cans the lastest on them from the DLA is that they may be sold
>but they must have the ammo labeling removed or painted over and they must
>be stecilled as empty. Easier for most DRMO's to just smash them I guess.
>As far as 50 cal weapons go the move is on for the ATF to declare by Federal
>Reg. that Destructive Device designation will change from "greater than .50
>cal" to ".50 cal and above". There will be an amnesty period for owners of
>50 cal Barretts etc to register them with the ATF NFA database and procure
the required Permits apparently.\

Ain't no permit for a DD. Just a transfer tax. Already have it, do
you have to get a transfer tax paid when you're not transfering.

> Not sure of the Federal date that this is
>active but it is after the CA statewide act.

I'd be surprised if this is happening. There's been some bills to do
it, but they all get killed. Do you have any more details on this
federal initiative?

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
-                 Data Center Operations Group                -
-               http://web.turner.com/data_center/             -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill                   One CNN Center SE0813 E -
- Internet Technologies   --   Data Center Operations Manager  -
- Hours 11am - 7pm Mon - Fri        (8Sdc, 10Sdc IT@3Ndc)      -
- Cellular: 404-545-6205             e-mail: Ryan.Gill@cnn.com -
- Office: 404-588-6191                                         -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-             Emergency Power-off != Door release!             -
----------------------------------------------------------------


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:38:50 PDT