From: G Shaw (milspectruck@verizon.net)
Date: Sat Nov 19 2005 - 09:17:39 PST
OK. I guess I should have been more explicit. DO NOT use any unit on a
vehicle it was not designed for. That is the best advice like Larry was
saying. Have I have a few CUCV's in my day YES. Can it be done Yes. Have
I done it Yes. Did it take some getting use to Yes. By the way it did not
put anything through windshields, it was just more powerfull in braking.
And it was not the right unit for the truck to be sure. I agree with Larry.
If I was you I would just run down to NAPA and get the right rebuiilt unit
and use the one you have as the core.
Later
G
-----Original Message-----
From: Military Vehicles Mailing List [mailto:mil-veh@mil-veh.org] On Behalf
Of Stu
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 12:03 PM
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
Subject: Re: [MV] brake booster CUCV
I don't believe you're correct. Larry Damore told me if you put the one
into a Blazer that is for the 1008 you will put yourself through the
windshield. I tend to believe Larry who is an expert on CUCV's. Each unit
will have a letter prefix to tell them apart. I am looking for info on that
letter prefix. When you consider a 1008 is a beefy 1 ton with much larger
brakes, and a Blazer is a 3/4 ton on 1/2 ton axles I'm not sure I would
trust my safety with switching them. Would you??
"Stu"
Southern NH, USA
"Live Free Or Die"
MVPA #14790
1967 M151A1 Jeep 1964 M416 Trailer
1985 M1008 CUCV Pickup
-----Original Message-----
From: G Shaw [mailto:milspectruck@verizon.net]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 11:50 AM
To: 'Stu'
Subject: RE: [MV] brake booster CUCV
If you have the NSN I may be able to look it up in a TM for you.
If you only have the part numbers on the unit which would be a Bendix or
DelcoMoraine number a NAPA counter man can tell which it is. Napa sells them
for both the pickup or blazer as rebuilts and needs a core so that is also
an option.
Personally I would have no problem in using a 1008 one in a 1009. The
Humvee hydrovac is the same as the 1009 except for the lines. It will have
higher pressure to the rear brakes that you would have to deal with, which
is not too bad but can cause rear lockup esp on snow etc. The 1008 requires
the higher brakes pressure to the rear due to the high load carrying and
larger brakes and it also has the dynamic pressure proportioning valve
system on the rear axle that varies the force. The 1009 does not have this.
A 1009 hydrovac can be used fine on a 1008 that is always carrying light
loads.
Glenn
-----Original Message-----
From: Stu [mailto:stuinnh@mvnut.us]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 11:27 AM
To: 'G Shaw'
Subject: RE: [MV] brake booster CUCV
Hi Glen!
So, which is which?
"Stu"
Southern NH, USA
"Live Free Or Die"
MVPA #14790
1967 M151A1 Jeep 1964 M416 Trailer
1985 M1008 CUCV Pickup
-----Original Message-----
From: G Shaw [mailto:milspectruck@verizon.net]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 11:25 AM
To: 'Stu'
Subject: RE: [MV] brake booster CUCV
Hi Stu
Different part numbers on them. They look the same and they will
interchange but have different pressure proportioning.
Glenn
-----Original Message-----
From: Military Vehicles Mailing List [mailto:mil-veh@mil-veh.org] On Behalf
Of Stu
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 9:30 AM
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List
Subject: [MV] brake booster CUCV
How can you tell which one is for 1008 vs 1009?
"Stu"
Southern NH, USA
"Live Free Or Die"
MVPA #14790
1967 M151A1 Jeep 1964 M416 Trailer
1985 M1008 CUCV Pickup
=Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com>
Visit the searchable archives at http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/
=Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com>
Visit the searchable archives at http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:32:04 PDT