Re: OT- Kansas Becomes a Concealed Carry State

From: MV (MV@dc9.tzo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2006 - 05:36:27 PST


But then isn't that also true of old unarmored vehicles also - no safety
glass, single master cylinders, etc. Are they banning those also?? (;->)

Stephen L Dussetschleger wrote:
> BUT, collectors of Armor historic vehicles cannot register them for the
> public roads like civilian armored vehicles?
>
> ** I believe one of the main arguements the stae was using was that the
> "mil-veh" armoured vehicles in question did NOT meet modern safety
> requirements ( seat belts, safety glass, maybe even dual reservoir master
> brake cylinder), unlike any other "civvy" armoured vehicles ( such as a
> former Brinks truck or whatnot).
> Steve ( across the border from KS)
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com>
> Visit the searchable archives at http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:42:43 PDT