Re: [MV] RE Ford tank engine

Richard Notton (Richard@fv623.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 07:16:13 +0100

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Root <root99@earthlink.net>
To: mil-veh@skylee.com <mil-veh@skylee.com>
Date: 18 June 1998 06:23
Subject: Re: [MV] RE Ford tank engine

>Richard Notton wrote:
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dr Deuce 264-0909 <keith@apache.ENET.dec.com>
>> To: @sky <"mail11:;;;;@us2rmc.zko.dec.com"@us2rmc.zko.dec.com;;;>
>> Cc: keith@apache.ENET.dec.com <keith@apache.ENET.dec.com>
>> Date: 16 June 1998 12:28
>> Subject: [MV] RE Ford tank engine

>Shafts and gears don't guarantee perfection either...
>
>-Rob Root
> 1942 GPW

Indeed they do not, however, for size and weight the configuration was the
only solution at the time and used extensively in similar designs.

It is surprising how little effort is actually needed to turn a camshaft,
having had a spanner on a few, once the heavy load of opening the first
valve from rest is overcome most of the energy is recovered by the valves
trying to close and it is possible to manually rotate the shaft quite
smartly.

Richard
(Southampton UK)

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.