Re: [MV] A fixed MVPA Election?

Richard Van Hoomissen (rvanhoo@IBM.net)
Sat, 10 Jul 1999 21:53:47 -0700

OK that satisfies me, I'm not renewing or buying anytghing from MVPA.
Richard.

jim gilmore wrote:
>
> Dear List (and MVPA) members;
>
> I have read the kind words spoken about me and I am humbled by them. I
> feel that it is time to put out the story of the latest attempt by the MVPA
> Board to influence the election by manipulating the nomination procedures.
> Here is the story so far...........
>
> I ran for the board of Directors in the last election and after the
> election
> was over I found that there were some "irregularities" shall we say, in the
> MVPA election process. I won't go into them here as most of you who have read
> the ad I ran in Military Vehicles last time already know what transpired. I
> was
> forced to "go to the membership" with my findings when the board did not
> appear
> to want to remedy the questionable past election process. This action on my
> part was a major reason the MVPA board revised the election rules so that no
> one person or group could unduly influence the outcome of the election (a
> fair,
> honest election was the goal) as in the past. At least that's what I
> thought
> at the time.
> This year I again sent my nomination in to the MVPA National Office. I
> was later called by the Nominating Committee chairman (and MVPA VP) Kenton
> Tucker to do a "phone interview to check my qualifications to run for the
> board". After a lengthy conversation with many questions, Mr Tucker stated he
> was satisfied that I had met all the six qualifications as outlined in the
> Bylaws. My qualifications are listed at the end of this letter. This was the
> last I heard from the committee until a friend called me right after the
> Convention to tell me that, at the Board meeting, the Committee had
> rejected my
> nomination "for cause".
> The next day I picked up a registered letter from the MVPA Vice President
> which stated the following:
>
> " After extensive review and discussion of your credentials, I regret to
> inform
> you that the committee did not recommend to the board of directors that you be
> placed on the slate of nominees. I can assure you that your resume and
> interview received a thorough professional review."
> No reason or "cause" was given! Why could I run in the last election
> and
> not this one?
>
> I immediately tried to contact the Vice president by phone. After
> several days, he did contact me and I asked him to explain the action of the
> committee and as to exactly what the reason or "cause" was. He stated that
> there was NO SPECIFIC REASON, just that the Committee had voted to reject my
> nomination. When pressed by me for an answer he mentioned that while I was
> qualified "the ad had something to do with the other committee members
> negative
> votes".
> Now, thoroughly confused, I contacted two other Board Members who I
> consider (and still do) good friends and asked them what they knew about this
> matter. They both had asked the Committee at the board meeting for a reason
> why
> I was to be excluded from the election. NO REASON WAS GIVEN TO THEM! One in
> fact then voted not to approve the "slate of Candidates" if I was not on it
> and
> the other said "We should let the voters decide". One of the two stated to me
> that the Nominating Committee had met with the MVPA's lawyers and in his
> opinion the other board members "were teaching me a lesson because I rocked
> the
> boat!".
>
> It then became obvious to me what was going on. The Nominating Committee
> must be appointed by the MVPA President, the board then approves them with
> the
> Vice President as the chairman as per the Bylaws. Let's look at who this
> committee's members are; Jerry Cleveland, Reg Hodgson, Lou Moore and Kenton
> Tucker. The first three are Board members that are appointed, NOT elected to
> the board. THEY CANNOT BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE! This leaves them free to do as
> they please and not worry about repercussions from the members. If they don't
> recommend a person, he can't run (or so they think). It makes a nice neat
> way
> to keep ANYONE they dislike out of the election and the rest of the board can
> sit back and say "it was the Nominating committee that wouldn't let him run,
> not us".
> What can the members do about it if it angers them?
>
> NOTHING !!! YOU CAN'T VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE !
>
> Sweet deal
> right? It now seems you will have to be a friend of the Committee (and the
> Board)
> to be allowed to run for office. They now have another way to influence the
> elections by controlling what members are "recommended" (allowed) to run for
> the Board. However, there is nothing in the MVPA Bylaws that says a candidate
> MUST be "recommended" to be able to run or be put on the ballot, just that he
> must pass the six qualifications.
>
> On July 5th I faxed the MVPA Nominating Committee the following
> question;
>
> "I ask the Committee to show just cause for their failure to present my
> nomination to the Board of Directors."
>
> A simple question right? They should have the reason right now since
> they
> rejected my nomination "for cause" before June 3,1999 ! Well, as of today,
> July 11th, I have not received an answer to this simple question.
>
> On July 5th I also faxed the Board of Directors (via MVPA HQ) the
> following question;
>
> "As a nominee who possesses all the qualifications set forth in Sec.
> 4.3 of the MVPA Bylaws I ask the Board of Directors to show just cause why my
> name is to be excluded from the slate of suitable candidates."
>
> Another simple question. So far I have not received a response. I see
> by a
> posting on this list from Katie Ferencz that the MVPA president has stated to
> her (by phone) that a letter will be drafted and sent to me with the reason
> within a week. Why wait a week when they should have already had the reason
> when I was "rejected with cause" back in the beginning of June? The MVPA has
> my phone and fax numbers and my e-mail address so it would be a simple
> thing to
> just contact me directly.
>
> This is the story so far. I am not looking to harm the club, create
> discontent or to start legal action unless I am forced to.
>
> I just wanted my chance to run in a fair and honest election.
>
> The membership should know if there is an attempt to take away their right to
> choose who will be elected to MVPA office. The Board of Directors should not
> use the MVPA election as their personal tool to punish members who disagree
> with them.
>
> Thanks for taking to time to read this,
>
> Jim Gilmore
>
> Qualifications for requirements for Board or Directors
> James Gilmore MVPA #5843
>
> (I) I have been a MVPA member for 15 years
> (II) I have attended three out of the last four conventions and regularly
> attend most of the rallies in the East and Midwest. I have
> also attended the 45th, 50th, and 55th MVPA Normandy Tours.
> (III) I am a founder of the 1st Michigan, Arsenal of Democracy Chapter MVPA
> and have served as Newsletter Editor, Vice President, and President of this
> chapter. I am one of the top recruiters of new MVPA members in the world.
> I am
> also acknowledged by the Ford Motor Company as the leading historian on Ford
> built military vehicles. I am an accredited researcher in both the National
> Archives and the Henry Ford Museum. Since 1980, I have been collecting,
> restoring and using military vehicles and currently own over 15 military
> vehicles.
> (IV) I am employed as a pressman in the Newsprint Department of the Detroit
> Newspapers and have been so for the past 28 years. I also hold a Federal
> Firearms license with an endorsement for the manufacture of automatic weapons.
> (V) I have never been convicted of a felony or other serious crime.
> (VI) I have never been removed from the MVPA Board of Directors.
>
> Jim
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> "Considered too dangerous to be allowed to run for the MVPA board"
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jim Gilmore MVPA # 5843
> 2565 Wiethoff Inkster, Mi. 48141
> 313-561-8826 Phone
> 313-730-1652 Fax
> jgilmore@oeonline.com
>
> =
> To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.