>I think that they are suggesting that any significant military equipment
>(SME) vehicle that has not been demilitarized should have been per existing
>laws at that time,
I know of no law, this is departmental codes or something to that effect.
> and therefore it would also be illegal to re-militarize
>them at a future date (since it would again become SME).
This gets very interesting however. If it is demilled (i.e. scrapped) then
it is scrap metal. Are they trying to imply that it will be illegal to make
a particular vehicle be it from scrap remains or from fresh new material?
If this is the case then they are going to have to make it illegal to own a
particular vehicle, no fooling around with demilling, the vehicle itself
will have to be outlawed, else I don't see how this could ever be enforced.
>And since when does the constitution come into play with modern US
>politics??????
Details, details....
je
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 09:32:24 PDT