Re: [MV] If Beltring is this good, why is it not held America?

From: Richard Notton (Richard@fv623.demon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 12:18:07 PST


----- Original Message -----
From: "NIGEL HAY" <nigel@milweb.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [MV] If Beltring is this good, why is it not held America?

> It may be due to the cost of shipping 3,029 vehicles and 12-8,1000
> participants from this side of the pond...... we also have a clever
election
> system (which I am sure our government would like to licence for use by
> other emerging nations)- when the winner is declared he takes power that
> very day.
> NIGE
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henry J. Fackovec" <fackovec@radiotech.com>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 3:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [MV] EVENTS 2001
>
>
> > If Beltring is this good, why is it not held America?
> >
Sort of like a question and its answer all in one go. . . . . . . . .

Goodness knows what it to be done if the Martians (not FV1103A or FV1119)
land and say "Take me to your leader".

Richard
Southampton - England



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 03 2000 - 20:29:49 PST