Re: [MV] NEW FROM CHRYSLER-BENZ

From: DaveCole (davidcole@tk7.net)
Date: Thu Mar 08 2001 - 16:18:00 PST


>
> There is absolutely no reason why Captialist companies can't act
> responsibly. In fact, it is often in their best long term fiscal
> interest, but thanks to short term Wall Street planning there is very
> little of that going on these days.
>
> Living in a small, rural, poor state we have been screwed over time and
> time again by selfish corporate interests, and we are left to pay the
> bill in one way shape or form. They say "don't restrict us or we will
> close up and move somewhere else", and so we bend over and take it hard.
> Then they move the jobs overseas to China, Mexico, and other dirt poor
> countries at the first sign that they can make more money. Don't believe
> me? Come and take a tour of all our closed up factories and see where
> the production is now...

>>>
I totally agree. The town I live in (900 people) had one large employer. They
made steering wheels for the big three, now some small town in Mexico has the
plant and they are making steering wheels. So much for NAFTA.

> >>>

> So although I don't think Socialism is the way to go, poluting a great
> fishing spots to save a couple of pennies per product is not something I
> will ever agree with.

>> Totally agree.

> And neither can I agree with a company that
> actively steers the brain-numbed masses towards something that is
> ultimately not in their best interests.

>>>
That's about 90% of the companies in the USA. Most of our economy is based on
selling flash (unfortunately, whether I like it or not) We all need a new car
with a bright shiney finish and a new house, and ...... being in sales, I
understand that I have to sell stuff to make a living. How many people
actually use a SUV to drive off road???? So if that is what they want, I'll
deliver it to the customer as long as I can do it without breaching my morals.
(Yes, salesman have morals also) Is it in their best interest?? It really
isn't my position to judge what everyone else believes is in their best
interest. (ie SUV are a lot safer than GEO Metros, but they use more gas which
causes more pollution.)

> >>

> As I said in my original email, I am not in favor of legislation in
> general. I am in favor of expressing disgust and anger towards companies
> that are screwing up MY future and increases MY taxes so they can make a
> quick buck and leave me to deal with the ramifications while they move
> off to China leaving most of the town unemployed. But when the abuses
> are extreme, like dumping toxic waste into my drinking water, there
> should be laws against it. Remember, pure Capitalism takes every single
> shortcut offered to it unless it feels legally or morally responsible to
> do otherwise. Sad part is many companies just don't get it.

>>>>
Unfortunately you are correct. I don't believe that Capitalism means you leave
your morals at home when you go to work. But of course, not everyone believes
as I do. (:->) Fortunately I have my M51 to tinker with to forget about how
screwed up the world is! (Shameless MV content plug)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 08:10:46 PDT