--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ryan M Gill
"Ok, I just spoke with a Staffer from Senator Levin's
office...............
..............Jonathan seemed annoyed by the panic the bill
caused as he states the reason is not to take collectable vehicles or
guns from civilians but rather to enable the DoD to recover lost
equipment. He stated that the Senate had a report filed somewhere
explaining the intent of the law and why it wasn't directed at
civilian owned firearms and vehicles, rather directed at current
military equipment."
RYAN,
The next time you contact Senator Levin's office, please ask Jonathan to
pass on to the Senator these two questions.
If the intent of the bill "is not to take collectable vehicles or guns
from civilians". Why did it not state that, in writing, in the bill ?
Second question. If "the Senate had a report filed somewhere
explaining the intent of the law". Why is there no reference to this
report mentioned anywhere in Section 1062 ?
Better yet listers, let's ask all of our Senator's and Rep's these
questions.
LANCE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 00:36:25 PST