Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?

From: Steve & Jeanne Keith (cckw@comcast.net)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 15:03:42 PDT


Now the electrical system;

That's another story......

stacked alternators, sub-lowest bidder for the glo
controller.

Most everyone I know who has one has the same problems

Steve AKA Dr Deuce

----- Original Message -----
From: "Caleb Pal, Network Operations" <sysop@spitfire.homelinux.com>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] M1009: Good and bad?

> Hey,
>
> Thank you all for your great insight. It sounds like the 6.2 isn't as bad
as
> people made it out to be. I will probably be looking for a M1009 soon.
Does
> anyone know an average price they can go for? I don't want a really
special
> one, just a rust free daily driver. If anyone knows of one on the west
> coast, please let me know! Also, things to look for when buying one.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Caleb Pal
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:24:59 PDT