From: Ida Heath (spike@defuniak.com)
Date: Wed Jul 07 2004 - 10:28:57 PDT
Search me Bruce,
During my twenty I never had a 543. What years did we have those? Was that
a wrecker?
Sorry I can't help but I know someone on the list, no doubt, can.
Keep us posted as to how you come out.
Sonny
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Beattie <bruce@eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: Ida Heath <spike@defuniak.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] MV Posts
> You're wlcome Sonny,
> Now, on a different note. Do you know if there was a M543A2
> configuration where a hydraulic pump was mounted directly on the
> transfer case? This would be the output that would go to the power divider
> on some configurations. I would like to mount a hydraulic pump there and
> after looking at the manual, it looks like there is an additional oil feed
> comming
> from the bottom of the transfer case to lubricate this output when used to
> drive the power divider. I am wondering if this is necessary if the
hydraulic
> pump
> is mounted directly to the transfer case.
>
> Any comments greatfully received.
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
> Ida Heath wrote:
>
> > Thanks Bruce,
> >
> > I'am much oblidged for your opinion. I have also enjoyed our exchange
of
> > private emails and again, I respect your opinion.
> >
> > Sonny
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bruce Beattie <bruce@eecs.berkeley.edu>
> > To: Ida Heath <spike@defuniak.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [MV] MV Posts
> >
> > > Hi Sonny,
> > > First off, I don't think anyone is trying to get you for something
a
> > > WO did to them.
> > > Here is my opinion and advice for which you may or may not agree
with.
> > > it is given
> > > in good faith with no bad feelings of any kind associated with it.
> > >
> > > To begin with, some of the things you said were not only
intelligent
> > > but made a lot of sense
> > > from a logical view point. I think you were right when you promoted
the
> > > idea of having every
> > > one work with the system that had been set up. I also suspect that
the
> > > system really is a good one.
> > >
> > > The problem comes as follows. You were in a very lucky situation where
> > > the command supported you
> > > and the system, and it verified to you that yes, the system can work
> > > well if followed properly.
> > > But, judgeing from some of the posts it would appear that most units
> > > were not like that, although
> > > admitadly the sample rate hear is much to small.
> > >
> > > The guys you are talking to were not so lucky and had to deal with a
lot
> > > of badly managed supply
> > > systems for one reason or another, and you are comming accross like
they
> > > are doing it all wrong.
> > > Regardless of what's right or wrong, people don't like being talked to
> > > that way.
> > >
> > > I think that is essentially the crux of the problem. But remember,
this
> > > is just my opinion, and
> > > that is all it is.
> > >
> > > My suggestion is as follows. Forget this whole thing ever happened,
and
> > > don't worry
> > > about what is right or wrong about the whole thing. You have a
wealth
> > > of knowledge which
> > > you can share, so do just that. If people say things you don't like,
hit
> > the
> > > delete key. Avoid topics that talk about opinions and stick to nuts
> > > and bolts. I think that
> > > eventually people will see your worth and forget about all this crap.
> > >
> > > I hope you take this advice in good faith and I hope that it is
usefull
> > > to you.
> > >
> > > Sincereley,
> > > Bruce
> > >
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
<mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:33:50 PDT