That auction trap

From: Douglas Greville (dgrev@iinet.net.au)
Date: Wed Dec 08 2004 - 13:58:59 PST


Chance

> That last one belongs to the type of person who hasn't worked out the
> difference between auction listings and magazine listings. It's like
> someone dropping off a diamond to get auctioned at Sotheby's, then going
> back after the sale to tell all concerned that it sold for a higher price at
> Herr Dettweiler's Hamburg Auction-o-terium simultaneously, so too bad for
> Sotheby's. Those people should be dragged through town behind a stagecoach.
> Alot.

We were talking to some people recently who wanted to auction off some
family heirlooms and approached that famous auction house and they were
basically told "our fee is 50% of the realised price at auction" BUT
there was also a non-sale fee if an item didn't make reserve and that
was a fair chunk of the reserve price.

Needless to say, after they got over their initial shock, they just
walked away.

Wonder how long it will be before the likes of a certain US surplus
auction organisation starts charging a "bidders fee" (as well as a
winner bidders premium), regardless of whether or not you actually bid
or win an item...........

Regards
Doug



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:38:51 PDT