Re: [MV] Cal. 50 and Calif. laws

From: Longhunter7 (longhunter7@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2005 - 11:28:42 PST


Bobby Joe!

The reason for the orange stock and forearm, was to identify that shotgun as
a NON-LETHAL shotgun! It is loaded ONLY with non-lethal ammunition!

They are used for beanbag, pepperballs, and baton rounds! You wouldn't want
to grab the wrong shotgun for a non lethal application! It gets messy!

Longhunter7 out!
WartHogs rule!

> From: "Bobby Joe Pendleton II" <bjpendleton@charter.net>
> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:43:41 -0500
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Subject: Re: [MV] Cal. 50 and Calif. laws
>
> Remington used to make a shotgun that had a bright orange stock and forearm.
> Only a fool would think it was not real because it was orange.
> "I...Shall Remain Confederate"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mil-Veh Co." <milveh@sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 1:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [MV] Cal. 50 and Calif. laws
>
>
>> Replica weapons must be painted bright orange in
>> California. Section 417 p.c.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this was one of those laws that had
>> "too many" unintended consequences. Our well meaning
>> socialists in CA. want to protect us from every risk
>> from cradle to grave, especially when it involves the
>> evil firearm.
>>
>> However, they overlook this truism of life...no matter
>> how many laws that are passed to protect humans it
>> will never be enough. But, one thing you can count
>> on, we'll lose a lot of freedoms in the process.
>>
>> Almost everything in life has some risk, just driving
>> your jeep or deuce down the road is risky in the eyes
>> of governement because it doesn't conform to DOT
>> standards AND that makes "you at risk" because someday
>> some pinhead will pass a law preventing you from
>> driving it or even owning it because its dangerous.
>> Don't laugh, look at the long list of banned items
>> already. Yours might be next.
>>
>> This is where we are headed folks and government
>> doesn't need to go there, thats strictly for personal
>> responsibility and accountability.
>>
>> --- Jon Shoop <shoop19@brick.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Went out to Alameda 2 years ago for the MVPA
>>> convention. My Lawyer told me
>>> not to take dummy weapons there unless they were
>>> painted orange.....totally!
>>>
>>> I said no way......Sounded pretty stupid to
>>> me.....so I checked into it and
>>> he was right! There was one item we were both not
>>> aware of.....that you can
>>
>>
>> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
>> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
>> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:39:26 PDT