Re: 900X20 TIRES

From: mydeuceandwillys@aol.com
Date: Fri Jun 02 2006 - 11:59:57 PDT


Exalent post, Since i have an air shift and am experienced in messing
up my vehicles i choose to be smart about where i engage my front wheel
drive , and i have with no problem to date, as long as the traction is
poor , i will do it, DO NOT do it with a sprg!!! Randy

-----Original Message-----
From: Bjorn Brandstedt <super_deuce@hotmail.com>
To: Military Vehicles Mailing List <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:43:58 -0400
Subject: Re: [MV] 900X20 TIRES

The M35 was not fitted with 1100-20 tires, but several variants were.
The M44 chassis truck, the M47 dump, the V17A/MTQ telephone const/maint
truck and the V18A/MTQ (M764) earth boring truck all had single 1100's.
(1965 TM 9-2320-209-10) 
If you run with different size tires on your vehicle (1100 in the front
and 900 in the rear), you can not engage all wheel drive without
expecting damage to the drive train as a result, there are no interaxle
diffs on these trucks. 
 
Bjorn 
MVPA19212 
 
>From: "Sonny Heath" <sonny@defuniak.com
>To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org
>Subject: Re: [MV] 900X20 TIRES 
>Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 22:23:37 -0500 

>I respectfully disagree with you, M35's were NOT equipped with 100X20
>tires. I don't think you can show me that in a TM 9-2320-209-10 or -20 

>Sonny 


 
 
===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list=== 
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to <
mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org
To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com
Visit the searchable archives at http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:47:03 PDT