Re: [MV] Jim Gilmore

Richard Van Hoomissen (rvanhoo@IBM.net)
Wed, 07 Jul 1999 14:19:29 -0700

While licensed as has since 1949 I do't belong to ARRL for about the
same reason. Don't know Mr. Gilmore or any of you writers but sounds
like a man to vote for. If MVPA operates this way I'm out! R

WILAX@aol.com wrote:
>
> In amateur radio, the ARRL is against, yes they lobby against, antique AM
> operation. I only operate CW and AM and the ARRL can only recognize ssb and
> digital modes. So whats the point you made? The ARRL is a niche lobbying
> and technical (with limited focus) group. Therefore I am not a member of
> ARRL. Should MVPA waste our money with lawyers and lobbiests? It sounds
> like the bias here is yes, we should get away from the mission of helping
> restorers preserve/restore vehicles and change to being a lobbying group.
> Well, as I stated before, once lawyers and lawsuits got involved in the MVCC
> it was the end of that club.
>
> Tom
> MVPA 4317
>
>
>
> ===
> To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.

===
To unsubscribe from the mil-veh mailing list, send the single word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of a message to <mil-veh-request@skylee.com>.