*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
You're absolutely right. This is no different than the recent hijacking - a
"terrorist" type of activity. the only example it could be used for is the
military's sloppy control over potentially dangerous assets. But then, who
would have thought that someone would steal a tank???
Ian Wallace, Seattle
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Military Vehicles List [mailto:mil-veh@uller.skylee.com]On Behalf
> Of Jaime A Ponce de Leon
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 11:19 PM
> To: Military Vehicles List
> Subject: [MV] Mil-Veh collection bad? (was)Re: [MV] Knob Creek Event
> 2000
>
>
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> > As we know, there is no body of knowledge or intelligence data
> that would
> > lead a reasonable person to believe that some collector of military
> > vehicles, armored or not, is a danger to the security of this
> country. Aside
> > from the fellow who stole a tank from an armory in LA and led
> police on a
> > merry pursuit until an officer shot and killed him, there are no other
> > documented cases that I know of.
>
> *-<SNIP>-*
>
> Ok, but... the fellow STOLE that there tank, it wasnt his, so...
> That case shouldnt even be used as an example as legal precedance or
> anything.
>
> (which is good for us)
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@uller.skylee.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
> <mil-veh-digest@uller.skylee.com>
> Send administrative queries to <mil-veh-request@uller.skylee.com>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 21 2000 - 18:15:03 PST