Re: [MV] Form 97....reality check...

From: ken uhrick (kuhrick@home.com)
Date: Tue Oct 10 2000 - 07:00:58 PDT


>
>Wonder what the DRMO would do if its director were to be summoned to state
>small claims court on a default of contract? If some sleazy car dealer
>tried the same crap, we all know what the outcome would be. If the DMV
>wants to force us to play the game, then I say let's play it! LOL! get the
>state to treat the DRMO just like a vehicle dealer!
>Most small claims courts would just about cover the value of an M35. The
>nice thing about small claims court is that once you are summoned, you
>MUST appear. That would not be looked upon well by superiors! (even if it
>didn't work) It would be well worth the $14 filing fee to find out! You
>just need to be creative and resourceful in deciding WHO to summon! A
>fellow employee once did this after battling for months on a payroll
>shortage that was bound up in silly red tape, and it got MAJOR attention
>from the corporate headquarters when the company treasurer was summoned to
>court. It made a major corporation and its officials look like a bunch of
>forth rate thieves! He was paid the day after the summons was served. If I
>had been that company treasurer, I would have taken STEPS to make sure
>that never happened again.
>HAY DONT PEE OFF THE DRMO SOO MUCH THAT THAY SCRAP ALL THE HMV"S



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2000 - 21:37:41 PST