Re: [MV] Officer posted response

From: JEFF HAIN-MATSON (flmv@flmv.net)
Date: Fri Jun 15 2001 - 06:11:38 PDT


my rant for what it's worth

i would think that if the local PD in ANY jurisdiction was paying the attention
that they should a trip by a local collector with a LEGALLY REGISTERED / TAGGED
/ INSURED vehicle shouldn't get a second look.
if however the local PD doesn't pay attention to what it's citizens do than i
can see the surprise situation.
with my unarmed 1/2 track i never get a second look yet from PD in the +-10
jurisdictions i have driven through.
however when i get my M8 on the road with registered gun the local PD will know
about it because they have singed paper work for it.
at that point i better not have any problems, since i will have a LEGALLY
REGISTERED / TAGGED / INSURED vehicle. i hate to think i will have to spend all
my time out on the side of the road explaining myself to various PD'S just
because my collector car is not a model T.

jeff

"Tom C." wrote:

> I felt compelled to respond to the officers post ref. the prob. encountered
> with the armored vehicle and his response:
>
> I'm sure you never anticipated such a response from collectors of HMVs. I
> read the list your response was posted on. I have been reading the many
> varied opinions posted. I was inclined to post myself as I have been a
> police officer in Medina, Ohio for 9 years. However,I did not post as I
> noted a large majority of the messages were in favor of responsible vehicle
> ownership and the proper respect for Law Enforcement Individuals such as
> yourself. Had I been in a similar situation I would have acted in the
> interest of my profession and brought into question the registration and
> insurance issues once I determined the vehicle was not a threat to the
> communities safety. Most of the population seems to think we are all
> clairvoyant and know who will be a problem and who will cooperate with our
> inquiries. We also tend to treat people as they treat us, but to a lesser
> extent and with some tact. Anyway I just wanted to let you know many
> are responsible and respectable owners of military vehicles. Many of the
> postings stated the owner should have advised the local jurisdictions in
> ref. to his activities that day because, as you know, we don't particularly
> like surprises, especially of the armored armed nature.
> Stay safe,
> Sincerely,
> Sgt. Tom Carrell
> Medina Police Dept.
> Medina, Ohio
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>

--
JEFF HAIN-MATSON
FRONT LINE MILITARY VEHICLES      WEB SITE:   www.flmv.net
WRIGHTSVILLE PA
717-252-4489 VOICE
717-252-4499 FAX
flmv@flmv.net   E-MAIL
MVPA #1833
IMPS #1726
MVT #9362



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 05 2001 - 00:40:36 PDT