Darrell,
As I read the List of Significant Military Equipment, Part 121 of DoD "rules"
the MB and GPW would fall under the requirements to be demilled simply
because they could mount a weapon (post mount or perhaps even the rifle
carrier on the windshield) or because they could carry ammunition.
The SME list is very vague.
WE ALL HAVE A LOT TO LOOSE... And all of America will loose a part of her
history.
Write, Call, FAX your Senator and the members of the Senate Armed Forces
Committee.
Claude.
Darrell Shake wrote:
> Someone please correct me if Im wrong on this but isnt the mb gpw family
> regarded as truck utlity 1/4ton 4x4 . And if this is so wouldnt that
> alone be grounds for demil under part121 . Pretty sure there is a line
> in there about military trucks under the vehicle classification. Might
> seem as though Im picking at small straws but if you delegate this on
> paper down to some low level staff wont they interpret this as simply
> letter of the law and go from that direction. Please remember that law
> is black and white only. Darrell. GOT ALOT TO LOOSE.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:59:01 PDT