Re: [MV] Solargizer/Redi-Pulse Technology

From: Steve & Jeanne Keith (cckw@attbi.com)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 09:04:14 PST


More specifically: the North Andover MA area of the Merrimac valley
area

Steve AKA Dr Deuce 8-)

----- Original Message -----
From: <kbernste32@aol.com>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MV] Solargizer/Redi-Pulse Technology

> RAM, correct. Bill Mays won't be hawking them. Perhaps
> RONCO !!! (Or should I say ROJOHA-CO). One or the
> other is always trying to foist scams off on us.
> These scams always seem to come from the Merrimac valley
> area, too.
>
> Kerry and Big Mike
>
>
> In a message dated 1/5/2003 8:19:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
cyclopsram@starband.net writes:
>
> >
> >
> > So Billy Mays won't be hyping them for $19.95 with a second one free if
you
> > order in the next ten seconds?? RAM
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <kbernste32@aol.com>
> > To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 17:25
> > Subject: [MV] Solargizer/Redi-Pulse Technology
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Well, list, excuse the engineering geek-ness, but I dug up the patents
> > that teach the Renew-it Technology, and the chemistry/physics is
credible.
> > The reference USP numbers are below. I was going to build my own from
> > radioshack parts, but elected to fork out the money and buy one that was
> > hermetically sealed. Pulsetech sold me the 120V plug-into-the wall
version
> > that they say is good for 24V, 36V, or 48V. The 12V battery circuit they
use
> > is cheaper, but may not have the sand for driving 2 12V loads in
parallel,
> > so the High Voltage version used on the 2 6TLs in series may be the
better
> > bet. The challenge in the design is achieving desired waveform and
> > frequency. Since it pumps charge, the voltage is not a big deal.
> > >
> > > I won't gunk up the list with the circuit design or the chemistry, but
the
> > patents have very good descriptions:
> > > U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,959,
> > > U.S. Pat. No. 5,063,341,
> > > U.S. Pat. No. 5,491,399
> > > They can be viewed at www.uspto.gov
> > > So I guess I believe it is not snake oil.
> > >
> > > Kerry
> > >
> > > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
> > <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
> > >
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:24:56 PDT