From: MV (MV@dc9.tzo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 29 2005 - 21:07:35 PST
The local Auto Electric starter/alternator rebuilder told me that the
Nippondenso stuff is superior to the Delco starters - in GM applications
- FWIW.
chance wolf wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron" <rojoha@adelphia.net>
> To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 12:07 PM
> Subject: [MV] Some CUCV, M101 and diesel things from the TB 43-0001-39
> series
>
>
>
>>MODEL:
>>
>>CUCV Family of Vehicles
>>
>>SUBJECT:
>>
>>Ohio Generator Starter NSN 2920-01-354-0409 (66022) P/N 313591
>
>
> Very useful info. Thanks for putting it up. I have one of the Nippondenso
> starters (12V) in one of the M1008s at work which works very well indeed,
> but have also had to replace a fried one from another 6.2 equipped vehicle
> we have which did not look that old. Who knows what abuse it took before we
> assumed ownership though, so judge accordingly. The Nippondenso starters
> seemed to be plentiful on Ebay when we bought ours, and weren't overly
> pricey either. They don't look as "heavy duty" as the GM ones though (and
> are about 1/2 the weight), so we'll have to see how they pan out after a
> couple of seasons of daily use.
>
> I'll have to look into the Ohio Generator Starter availability.
>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 07 2005 - 20:41:26 PDT