From: Everette (194cbteng@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue Jun 07 2005 - 09:44:25 PDT
My wife saw that my membership had expired to the WWII oriented MVPA, and
thought she was doing right by sending in renewal.. Therefore I am
presently a member of the anti post war group but not of my own volition.
I agree about Supply Line, paid advertising is only place I saw post war
mentioned. I have lots of friends that own and operate WWII vehicles but I
prefer post war M series, I guess this makes me some sort of second class
collector.
Everette
With an increasing admiration of your constancy and devotion to your
country, and a grateful remembrance of your kind and generous considerations
for myself, I bid you all an affectionate farewell.
R. E. Lee, General
General Order number 9d
----- Original Message -----
From: <flyn3nvt@adelphia.net>
To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [MV] MVPA - interesting reading on the G503 list
> i am not againsed ww2 vehicles either. infact one day i would like to own
a half-track and try it out. But for now I am to busy working on my Vietnam
Collection. i will look into getting back into the MVPA. So the supply
line hasent gotten any better over the yrs????? I was one of the ones that
watched the pages disapear.
> ---- chance wolf <chance_wolf@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "JEFF HAIN-MATSON" <flmv@flmv.net>
> > To: "Military Vehicles Mailing List" <mil-veh@mil-veh.org>
> > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [MV] MVPA - interesting reading on the G503 list
> >
> >
> > > That would be the WWII jeep collectors club mentality, I have ranted
> > > about it in the past here, look at the archives!!
> > >
> > > > additude the group showed me. I cant imagine the EAA supporting the
> > > P-51 only and not the little >guys. I know that I am not the only
one
> > > that has felt that way. Maybe the member that is not >getting
> > > re-elected is M-series modivated??
> >
> > Very interesting reading over there - all six pages of it - and not the
good
> > kind.
> >
> > Sweeping things under the rug in avoidance of full-disclosure is always
the
> > best way of turning something relatively small into something
> > Club-destroying. It all seems very unnecessary. If such actions were
taken
> > with the Greater Interests of the Club at heart - then the reasoning
should
> > be trotted out for the membership to see if everyone's definition of
> > "Greater Interests" coincides with that of the Board's. Anything less
will
> > pour gas on a fire which should never have been lit to begin with.
> >
> >
> >
> > ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to
<mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> > To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to: <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, send e-mail to <mil-veh-digest@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ack@mil-veh.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 28 2005 - 22:47:28 PDT