From: Rick v100 (rickv100@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:28:36 PST
The last time this was tried in the US under the
Section 1066 of the Defense authorization it was the
big boys with the military airplanes that got it
squashed.
Is there such a group in France of military aircraft
owners who would be affected?
Rick
--- Michael Howell <doctormv@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> Quoting Jim Cooney <triumphtrash13@eircom.net>:
>
> > ......and eat their fries!
> >
> > Seriously folks Nigel is right. There are a hell
> of a lot of US
> > Military Vehicles among other nationality vehicles
> in private hands
> > in France and if their enthusiastic owners lose
> them in effect we all
> > lose the history they represent and the reference
> information they
> > provide to a lot of us in the hobby.
> >
> > Jim in Ireland
> > M1008 CUCV & S-250 Shelter
> >
> >
>
**************************************************************************************************************************
> Does anyone know if parts to the banned items are
> also banned? All of
> those MV collectors have to be hording a lot of NOS
> parts. And what
> about the TM's for the banned items? I know we all
> hope this gets
> repealed and they get to keep there stuff, but they
> might want to have
> a contingency plan to get some of their investment
> back if it isn't.
> It would be better to break them down into parts and
> export what they
> can even if the whole cannot be exported. I sure
> wouldn't want to give
> them to the government to be scrapped.
>
>
>
> Mike
> Tishomingo, Mississippi
>
>
> ===Mil-Veh is a member-supported mailing list===
> To unsubscribe, send e-mail to
> <mil-veh-off@mil-veh.org>
> To reach a human, contact <ackyle@gmail.com>
> Visit the searchable archives at
> http://www.mil-veh.org/archives/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 21:40:50 PDT